Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Albertsons Companies, Inc.
How Albertsons Companies, Inc. stacks up
ACI · against 122 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Growth
20/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #107 of 123 · scores higher than 13% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score12 peers with a growth score of 20–29, including ACI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 20?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Defensive companies.Mainly because of its earnings per share growth, which is weaker than most Consumer Defensive peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 99% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -92.1% vs peer median 1.5%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 2.0% vs peer median 3.7%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 2.7% vs peer median 2.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ACI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ACI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 123 reported | 2.7% | 3.8% | 40% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 103 reported | -92.1% | 2.3% | 0% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 123 reported | 2.0% | 4.6% | 34% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ACI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 30.7B BRL (≈$5.5B) | 100 | 76 | |
| 1 | 5.5B USD | 100 | 84 | |
| 3 | 8.84T KRW (≈$6.4B) | 98 | 72 | |
| 3 | 29.8B HKD (≈$3.8B) | 98 | 76 | |
| 3 | 3.3B USD | 98 | 71 | |
| 101 | 11.7B CAD (≈$8.6B) | 25 | 33 | |
| 104 | 6.5B USD | 24 | 51 | |
| 105 | 6.1B USD | 22 | 58 | |
| 106 | 11.7B USD | 21 | 35 | |
| 107 | 6.4B USD | 20 | 29 | |
| 108 | 6.5B USD | 19 | 37 | |
| 109 | 1.52T JPY (≈$10.4B) | 18 | 24 | |
| 109 | 9.3B EUR (≈$10.2B) | 18 | 36 | |
| 109 | 11.3B USD | 18 | 35 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score