Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
ACET · against 33 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #9 of 34 · scores higher than 76% of peers · safety percentile 60
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)2 peers with a safety percentile of 60–69, including ACET · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio and debt / equity, but weaker beta than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | ACET | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 26 reported | 0.11× | 0.17× | 72% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 34 reported | 1.59 | 0.85 | 15% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 35 reported | 6.71× | 2.48× | 88% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.4B JPY (≈$57M) | 98 | ||
| 2 | 276M SEK (≈$28M) | 96 | 48 | |
| 3 | 31M USD | 91 | ||
| 4 | 298M SEK (≈$30M) | 83 | 48 | |
| 5 | 22M USD | 81 | 47 | |
| 6 | 2.8B JPY (≈$19M) | 78 | ||
| 7 | 74.0B KRW (≈$53M) | 76 | 34 | |
| 8 | 250M SEK (≈$25M) | 65 | 44 | |
| 9 | 30M USD | 60 | ||
| 10 | 23M USD | 58 | ||
| 11 | 271M SEK (≈$27M) | 56 | 41 | |
| 12 | 373M HKD (≈$48M) | 55 | 34 | |
| 13 | 216M HKD (≈$28M) | 55 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score