Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to ProFrac Holding Corp.
How ProFrac Holding Corp. stacks up
ACDC · against 94 other Energy companies of similar size
Valuation
12/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #77 of 95 · scores higher than 17% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score13 peers with a valuation score of 10–19, including ACDC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 12?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield, free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, which are weaker than most Energy peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -51.8% vs peer median 5.2%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -8.0% vs peer median 6.2%
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 65% of peers. EBITDA yield: 7.3% vs peer median 12.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ACDC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ACDC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 92 reported | -55.6% | 4.5% | 1% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 99 reported | 9.8% | 11.2% | 39% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 55 reported | -8.0% | 4.2% | 20% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 94 reported | 71.4% | 74.1% | 46% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ACDC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.2B MYR (≈$487M) | 99 | 60 | |
| 1 | 942M USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 3 | 1.1B USD | 98 | 55 | |
| 3 | 1.18T ARS (≈$1.2B) | 98 | 98 | |
| 5 | 2.1B AUD (≈$1.4B) | 97 | 68 | |
| 74 | 7.5B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 13 | 38 | |
| 74 | 9.2B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 13 | 14 | |
| 74 | 900M USD | 13 | 56 | |
| 77 | 4.2B CNY (≈$595M) | 12 | 28 | |
| 77 | 759M USD | 12 | 7 | |
| 77 | 1.5B USD | 12 | 35 | |
| 80 | 4.1B CNY (≈$568M) | 11 | 32 | |
| 81 | 4.7B CNY (≈$664M) | 9 | 31 | |
| 81 | 1.0B USD | 9 | 24 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score