Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
ACCO · against 2,436 other Industrials companies
Ranked #2,006 of 2,437 · scores higher than 18% of peers · safety percentile 18
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)244 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including ACCO · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity and beta, which are weaker than most Industrials peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | ACCO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 2,360 reported | 1.46× | 0.41× | 13% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 2,360 reported | 1.18 | 0.61 | 16% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 2,374 reported | 1.97× | 1.62× | 64% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.0B CNY (≈$280M) | 100 | 54 | |
| 2 | 79.5B JPY (≈$540M) | 100 | 79 | |
| 3 | 105.3B JPY (≈$716M) | 100 | 85 | |
| 4 | 38M MYR (≈$8M) | 100 | ||
| 4 | 157M USD | 100 | 35 | |
| 2,002 | 3.6B CNY (≈$511M) | 18 | 52 | |
| 2,003 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 38.2B THB (≈$1.1B) |
| 18 |
| 60 |
| 2,004 | 18.4B USD | 18 | 46 |
| 2,005 | 11.2B SEK (≈$1.1B) | 18 | 42 |
| 2,006 | 479M USD | 18 | 42 |
| 2,007 | 194.2B INR (≈$2.3B) | 18 | 53 |
| 2,008 | 1.4B USD | 18 | 14 |
| 2,009 | 4.3B EUR (≈$4.7B) | 18 | 63 |
| 2,010 | 92.8B USD | 18 | 45 |