Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Arbor Realty Trust, Inc.
How Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. stacks up
ABR · against 662 other Real Estate companies
Valuation
76/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #157 of 663 · scores higher than 76% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score66 peers with a valuation score of 70–79, including ABR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 76?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly thanks to its free cash flow yield, which is stronger than most Real Estate peers.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 94% of peers. Earnings yield: 12.8% vs peer median 5.3%
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 81% of peers. EBITDA yield: 1.8% vs peer median 5.4%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 97% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 60.2% vs peer median 6.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ABR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ABR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 708 reported | -33.1% | 5.3% | 6% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 681 reported | Not reported | 5.3% | — | — | 50% |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 307 reported | 60.2% | 6.8% | 97% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 724 reported | 678.1% | 112.8% | 95% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ABR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 227M MYR (≈$50M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 6.0B BRL (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 91 | |
| 3 | 394M HKD (≈$50M) | 99 | 33 | |
| 3 | 2.9B HKD (≈$365M) | 99 | 76 | |
| 3 | 3.2B HKD (≈$407M) | 99 | 66 | |
| 150 | 1.2B USD | 77 | 41 | |
| 150 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score