Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Airbnb, Inc.
How Airbnb, Inc. stacks up
ABNB · against 31 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Growth
75/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #11 of 32 · scores higher than 68% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score5 peers with a growth score of 70–79, including ABNB · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 75?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its revenue growth and 3-year revenue growth, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 7.5% vs peer median 4.2%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 79% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 13.1% vs peer median 4.3%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 82% of peers. Revenue growth: 13.6% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ABNB, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ABNB | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 32 reported | 13.6% | 8.1% | 81% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 29 reported | 7.5% | 5.6% | 71% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 32 reported | 13.1% | 9.0% | 65% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ABNB| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 79.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 2 | 73.8B EUR (≈$81.2B) | 98 | 58 | |
| 3 | 79.4B USD | 94 | 46 | |
| 3 | 84.3B USD | 94 | 53 | |
| 5 | 458.9B HKD (≈$58.7B) | 82 | 53 | |
| 5 | 2.15T MXN (≈$116.3B) | 82 | 87 | |
| 8 | 57.0B USD | 81 | 52 | |
| 9 | 83.8B USD | 77 | 52 | |
| 10 | 74.3B USD | 76 | 66 | |
| 11 | 100.0B USD | 75 | 58 | |
| 12 | 117.0B USD | 72 | 56 | |
| 13 | 678.2B CNY (≈$94.9B) | 70 | 69 | |
| 14 | 52.8B USD | 68 | 52 | |
| 15 | 659.6B HKD (≈$84.4B) | 67 | 72 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score