Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Airbnb, Inc.
How Airbnb, Inc. stacks up
ABNB · against 355 other Consumer Cyclical companies listed in US-listed
Growth
75/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #101 of 356 · scores higher than 70% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score46 peers with a growth score of 70–79, including ABNB · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 75?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its revenue growth and 3-year revenue growth, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 7.5% vs peer median 4.2%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 79% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 13.1% vs peer median 4.3%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 82% of peers. Revenue growth: 13.6% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ABNB, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ABNB | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 358 reported | 13.6% | 5.9% | 76% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 249 reported | 7.5% | 6.2% | 51% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 353 reported | 13.1% | 4.1% | 80% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ABNB| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 79.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 1 | 3.1B USD | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 47.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 4 | 17.7B USD | 99 | 54 | |
| 4 | 293M USD | 99 | 89 | |
| 92 | 4.8B USD | 77 | 67 | |
| 98 | 13.8B USD | 76 | 70 | |
| 98 | 23.5B USD | 76 | 62 | |
| 98 | 74.3B USD | 76 | 66 | |
| 101 | 100.0B USD | 75 | 58 | |
| 101 | 15.1B USD | 75 | 54 | |
| 101 | 8.7B USD | 75 | 59 | |
| 101 | 232M USD | 75 | 48 | |
| 101 | 5.2B USD | 75 | 54 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score