Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Ambev S.A.
How Ambev S.A. stacks up
ABEV · against 47 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Growth
42/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #36 of 48 · scores higher than 23% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score8 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including ABEV · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 42?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Defensive companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Defensive norm.
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 69% of peers. Revenue growth: -1.4% vs peer median 2.8%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 3.4% vs peer median 3.7%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 7.4% vs peer median 1.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ABEV, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ABEV | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 48 reported | -1.4% | 3.9% | 15% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 42 reported | 7.4% | 10.9% | 44% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 48 reported | 3.4% | 3.6% | 45% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ABEV| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 72.6B EUR (≈$79.8B) | 96 | 79 | |
| 2 | 503.8B HKD (≈$64.5B) | 94 | 73 | |
| 3 | 148.0B DKK (≈$22.2B) | 88 | 56 | |
| 3 | 47.3B USD | 88 | 47 | |
| 5 | 2.19T INR (≈$26.3B) | 87 | 59 | |
| 32 | 35.5B USD | 48 | 40 | |
| 33 | 199.1B CNY (≈$27.9B) | 47 | 43 | |
| 34 | 37.1B USD | 45 | 48 | |
| 35 | 34.0B USD | 44 | 39 | |
| 36 | 40.7B USD | 42 | 66 | |
| 36 | 70.1B USD | 42 | 47 | |
| 38 | 76.2B USD | 41 | 43 | |
| 39 | 3.43T INR (≈$41.2B) | 36 | 62 | |
| 40 | 29.1B USD | 30 | 28 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score