Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
AAPL · against 1,692 other Technology companies
Ranked #1,370 of 1,693 · scores higher than 19% of peers · safety percentile 19
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)169 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including AAPL · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its current ratio, debt / equity and beta, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | AAPL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,615 reported | 0.78× | 0.26× | 22% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,642 reported | 1.07 | 0.84 | 35% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,684 reported | 1.00× | 1.83× | 12% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7.8B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 81 | |
| 1 | 49.7B JPY (≈$338M) | 100 | 67 | |
| 3 | 2.8B CNY (≈$387M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 4 | 6.67T KRW (≈$4.8B) | 100 | 82 | |
| 5 | 338M USD | 100 | 37 | |
| 1,366 | 354M USD | 19 | 53 | |
| 1,367 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 2.2B HKD (≈$276M) |
| 19 |
| 35 |
| 1,368 | 6.1B USD | 19 | 43 |
| 1,369 | 115.2B TWD (≈$3.6B) | 19 | 74 |
| 1,370 | 4.97T USD | 19 | 58 |
| 1,371 | 2.4B HKD (≈$309M) | 19 | 42 |
| 1,372 | 15.1B CNY (≈$2.1B) | 19 | 42 |
| 1,373 | 12.2B HKD (≈$1.6B) | 19 | 54 |
| 1,374 | 133.0B TWD (≈$4.1B) | 19 | 41 |