Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
AAMI · against 183 other Financial Services companies listed in US-listed
Ranked #165 of 184 · scores higher than 10% of peers · safety percentile 12
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)24 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including AAMI · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta, debt / equity and current ratio, which are weaker than most Financial Services peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | AAMI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 160 reported | 1.93× | 0.69× | 15% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 171 reported | 1.32 | 0.89 | 21% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 177 reported | 1.05× | 1.59× | 31% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 313M USD | 97 | ||
| 2 | 1.5B USD | 96 | 74 | |
| 3 | 9.6B USD | 95 | 73 | |
| 4 | 462M USD | 92 | 70 | |
| 5 | 5.0B USD | 92 | 47 | |
| 161 | Unavailable | 14 | 43 | |
| 162 | 46.6B USD |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 14 |
| 40 |
| 163 | 775M USD | 13 | 28 |
| 164 | 1.9B USD | 13 | 47 |
| 165 | 3.1B USD | 12 | 48 |
| 166 | 90.7B USD | 12 | 33 |
| 167 | 14.6B USD | 11 | 20 |
| 168 | 87.2B USD | 11 | 49 |
| 169 | 42.8B USD | 11 | 39 |