Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
ZVRA · against 481 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #156 of 482 · scores higher than 68% of peers · safety percentile 72
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)50 peers with a safety percentile of 70–79, including ZVRA · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its debt / equity and current ratio, which are stronger than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | ZVRA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 447 reported | 0.01× | 0.17× | 89% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 459 reported | 0.95 | 0.40 | 22% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 476 reported | 5.17× | 2.87× | 71% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.2B USD | 100 | 40 | |
| 2 | 1.1B USD | 100 | ||
| 3 | 1.0B USD | 99 | 35 | |
| 4 | 421M USD | 99 | 52 | |
| 5 | 1.2B USD | 99 | ||
| 152 | 357M USD | 73 | 32 | |
| 153 | 143.9B JPY (≈$978M) | 73 | 26 | |
| 154 | 5.7B HKD (≈$725M) | 72 | 58 | |
| 155 | 7.2B CNY (≈$1.0B) | 72 | 62 | |
| 156 | 609M USD | 72 | 91 | |
| 157 | 3.1B CNY (≈$438M) | 72 | 46 | |
| 158 | 4.7B CNY (≈$661M) | 72 | 26 | |
| 159 | 6.8B HKD (≈$867M) | 72 | 56 | |
| 160 | 18.29T IDR (≈$1.1B) | 71 | 79 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score