Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Zumiez Inc.
How Zumiez Inc. stacks up
ZUMZ · against 340 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Profitability
32/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #178 of 341 · scores higher than 47% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score44 peers with a profitability score of 30–39, including ZUMZ · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 32?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its operating margin and return on assets, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 77% of peers. Operating margin: 2.2% vs peer median 6.4%
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 64% of peers. Return on assets: 2.0% vs peer median 3.3%
- Return on invested capital is close to the peer norm. Return on invested capital: 7.0% vs peer median 7.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ZUMZ, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ZUMZ | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 316 reported | 7.0% | 3.8% | 66% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 339 reported | 2.2% | 3.9% | 37% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 326 reported | 2.0% | 2.0% | 50% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 320 reported | 4.4% | 4.2% | 51% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 342 reported | 36.1% | 26.4% | 63% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ZUMZ| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.5B BRL (≈$267M) | 99 | 92 | |
| 2 | 23.9B JPY (≈$162M) | 98 | 81 | |
| 2 | 396M AUD (≈$262M) | 98 | 78 | |
| 2 | 418M USD | 98 | 53 | |
| 5 | 6.9B TWD (≈$214M) | 95 | 76 | |
| 178 | 30.3B JPY (≈$206M) | 32 | 60 | |
| 178 | 44.6B JPY (≈$303M) | 32 | 60 | |
| 178 | 1.2B HKD (≈$154M) | 32 | 48 | |
| 178 | 3.9B SEK (≈$394M) | 32 | 38 | |
| 178 | 219M USD | 32 | 56 | |
| 183 | 2.7B CNY (≈$380M) | 31 | 36 | |
| 183 | 12.4B THB (≈$347M) | 31 | 34 | |
| 183 | 367M CHF (≈$422M) | 31 | 45 | |
| 186 | 2.6B CNY (≈$370M) | 30 | 43 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score