Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
ZUMZ · against 361 other Consumer Cyclical companies listed in US-listed
Ranked #135 of 362 · scores higher than 63% of peers · safety percentile 36
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)46 peers with a safety percentile of 30–39, including ZUMZ · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | ZUMZ | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 319 reported | 0.81× | 0.99× | 58% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 348 reported | 1.00 | 1.14 | 62% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 362 reported | 1.72× | 1.47× | 61% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.4B USD | 96 | 89 | |
| 2 | 499M USD | 95 | 72 | |
| 3 | 141M USD | 95 | 30 | |
| 4 | 293M USD | 95 | 89 | |
| 5 | 283M USD | 94 | 48 | |
| 131 | 327M USD | 37 | 51 | |
| 132 | 13.9B USD | 37 | 44 | |
| 133 | 100.0B USD | 37 | 58 | |
| 134 | 1.3B USD | 36 | 48 | |
| 135 | 219M USD | 36 | 56 | |
| 136 | 7.4B USD | 36 | 64 | |
| 137 | 2.6B USD | 36 | 49 | |
| 138 | 2.0B USD | 36 | 64 | |
| 139 | 383M USD | 36 | 40 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score