Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Zoom Communications, Inc.
How Zoom Communications, Inc. stacks up
ZM · against 137 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
84/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #17 of 138 · scores higher than 88% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score11 peers with a valuation score of 80–89, including ZM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 84?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield, free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 67% of peers. EBITDA yield: 6.8% vs peer median 4.2%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 79% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 7.0% vs peer median 2.7%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 97% of peers. Earnings yield: 11.8% vs peer median 2.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ZM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ZM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 138 reported | 11.7% | 3.2% | 99% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 135 reported | 6.8% | 5.1% | 69% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 97 reported | 7.2% | 3.3% | 82% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 130 reported | 37.0% | 17.1% | 84% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ZM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25.5B USD | 97 | 56 | |
| 2 | 1.42T TWD (≈$44.0B) | 95 | 75 | |
| 3 | 3.89T JPY (≈$26.5B) | 94 | 73 | |
| 3 | 20.1B USD | 94 | 68 | |
| 5 | 17.5B USD | 93 | 93 | |
| 13 | 195.0B BRL (≈$35.1B) | 86 | 73 | |
| 14 | 20.7B EUR (≈$22.8B) | 85 | 51 | |
| 14 | 14.4B USD | 85 | 59 | |
| 14 | 17.8B USD | 85 | 63 | |
| 17 | 26.8B USD | 84 | 85 | |
| 18 | 657.0B TWD (≈$20.4B) | 82 | 70 | |
| 18 | 4.77T JPY (≈$32.5B) | 82 | 62 | |
| 20 | 19.0B USD | 80 | 54 | |
| 21 | 605.4B TWD (≈$18.8B) | 79 | 59 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score