Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Zoom Communications, Inc.
How Zoom Communications, Inc. stacks up
ZM · against 137 other Technology companies of similar size
Growth
84/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #41 of 138 · scores higher than 70% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score24 peers with a growth score of 80–89, including ZM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 84?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth, which is stronger than most Technology peers.
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 5.0% vs peer median 8.5%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 3.8% vs peer median 4.8%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 92% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 181.7% vs peer median 11.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ZM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ZM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 138 reported | 5.0% | 13.8% | 17% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 123 reported | 181.7% | 20.2% | 89% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 137 reported | 3.8% | 8.7% | 32% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ZM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 241.8B CNY (≈$33.9B) | 100 | 85 | |
| 1 | 40.5B USD | 100 | 75 | |
| 1 | 28.4B USD | 100 | 79 | |
| 4 | 42.6B USD | 99 | 60 | |
| 5 | 835.6B TWD (≈$25.9B) | 98 | 80 | |
| 38 | 51.9B USD | 86 | 63 | |
| 38 | 47.7B USD | 86 | 58 | |
| 40 | 39.2B USD | 85 | 51 | |
| 41 | 353.3B CNY (≈$49.5B) | 84 | 64 | |
| 41 | 26.8B USD | 84 | 85 | |
| 43 | 139.7B CNY (≈$19.6B) | 83 | 59 | |
| 44 | 20.0B USD | 82 | 78 | |
| 45 | 17.8B USD | 81 | 63 | |
| 45 | 48.4B USD | 81 | 36 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score