Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
ZM · against 496 other Technology companies listed in US-listed
Ranked #60 of 497 · scores higher than 87% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score51 peers with a valuation score of 80–89, including ZM · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its earnings yield, free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
| Metric | ZM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 495 reported | 11.7% | 1.9% | 97% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 499 reported | 6.8% | 4.0% | 72% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 465 reported | 7.2% | 3.3% | 79% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 490 reported | 37.0% | 22.1% | 68% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.1B USD | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 1.7B USD | 100 | 67 | |
| 1 | 763M USD | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 404M USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 5 | 662M USD | 98 | 57 | |
| 60 | 1.3B USD | 84 | 37 | |
| 60 | 2.0B USD | 84 | 70 | |
| 60 | 6.1B USD | 84 | 51 | |
| 60 | 12.9B USD | 84 | 53 | |
| 60 | 26.8B USD | 84 | 85 | |
| 66 | 7.6B USD | 83 | 55 | |
| 66 | 7.1B USD | 83 | 68 | |
| 66 | 324M USD | 83 | 50 | |
| 66 | 1.0B USD | 83 | 75 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score