Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to ZKH Group Limited
How ZKH Group Limited stacks up
ZKH · against 379 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
6/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #332 of 380 · scores higher than 10% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score54 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including ZKH · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 6?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield, free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -8.8% vs peer median 4.4%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -2.8% vs peer median 6.1%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. EBITDA yield: -105.5% vs peer median 8.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ZKH, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ZKH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 364 reported | Not reported | 3.2% | — | — | 30% |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 388 reported | -9.7% | 8.9% | 3% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 127 reported | Not reported | 6.8% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 365 reported | 185.6% | 76.0% | 87% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ZKH| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 198.5B KRW (≈$143M) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 623.0B KRW (≈$449M) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 382.5B KRW (≈$275M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 412.0B KRW (≈$297M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 1 | 130M EUR (≈$143M) | 100 | 46 | |
| 332 | 322M USD | 6 | 23 | |
| 332 | 283M USD | 6 | 48 | |
| 332 | 463M USD | 6 | 26 | |
| 332 | 4.1B TRY (≈$123M) | 6 | 6 | |
| 332 | 237M USD | 6 | 35 | |
| 344 | 2.9B CNY (≈$408M) | 5 | 28 | |
| 344 | 3.2B CNY (≈$453M) | 5 | 40 | |
| 344 | 2.7B CNY (≈$376M) | 5 | 9 | |
| 344 | 3.0B CNY (≈$422M) | 5 | 14 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score