Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
ZIM · against 557 other Industrials companies of similar size
Ranked #315 of 558 · scores higher than 44% of peers · safety percentile 40
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)66 peers with a safety percentile of 40–49, including ZIM · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | ZIM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 550 reported | 1.37× | 0.46× | 14% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 543 reported | 1.11 | 0.71 | 22% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 533 reported | 1.24× | 1.54× | 30% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.5B USD | 100 | 33 | |
| 2 | 5.7B USD | 99 | 36 | |
| 3 | 350.8B JPY (≈$2.4B) | 99 | 83 | |
| 4 | 28.9B CNY (≈$4.0B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 5 | 2.45T CLP (≈$2.7B) | 99 | ||
| 311 | 4.0B USD | 40 | 69 | |
| 312 | 22.8B CNY (≈$3.2B) | 40 | 49 | |
| 313 | 1.9B GBP (≈$2.5B) | 40 | 52 | |
| 314 | 1.5B GBP (≈$2.0B) | 40 | 50 | |
| 315 | 3.5B USD | 40 | 57 | |
| 316 | 17.6B CNY (≈$2.5B) | 40 | 43 | |
| 317 | 384.1B INR (≈$4.6B) | 40 | 29 | |
| 318 | 49.2B NOK (≈$4.7B) | 40 | 41 | |
| 319 | 30.8B CNY (≈$4.3B) | 40 | 73 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score