Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
How ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. stacks up
ZIM · against 552 other Industrials companies of similar size
Profitability
85/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #98 of 553 · scores higher than 81% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score80 peers with a profitability score of 80–89, including ZIM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 85?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly thanks to its return on invested capital, operating margin and return on assets, which are stronger than most Industrials peers.
- a higher return on assets: stronger than 63% of peers. Return on assets: 4.4% vs peer median 3.1%
- a wider operating margin: stronger than 77% of peers. Operating margin: 14.7% vs peer median 7.7%
- a higher return on invested capital: stronger than 92% of peers. Return on invested capital: 26.2% vs peer median 7.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ZIM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ZIM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 532 reported | 26.2% | 9.2% | 89% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 557 reported | 14.7% | 9.2% | 72% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 523 reported | 4.4% | 4.0% | 54% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 520 reported | 3.6% | 10.3% | 18% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 561 reported | 31.0% | 28.0% | 59% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ZIMScores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score