Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
ZD · against 124 other Communication Services companies of similar size
Ranked #68 of 125 · scores higher than 46% of peers · safety percentile 52
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)14 peers with a safety percentile of 50–59, including ZD · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio, but weaker beta than most Communication Services peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | ZD | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 121 reported | 0.40× | 0.33× | 45% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 119 reported | 1.02 | 0.64 | 18% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 121 reported | 2.16× | 1.48× | 68% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 17.62T IDR (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 76 | |
| 2 | 8.4B CNY (≈$1.2B) | 98 | 58 | |
| 3 | 2.3B USD | 97 | 55 | |
| 4 | 1.90T KRW (≈$1.4B) | 96 | 73 | |
| 5 | 12.0B CNY (≈$1.7B) | 95 | 29 | |
| 64 | 3.1B USD | 53 | 67 | |
| 65 | 6.4B ILS (≈$1.7B) | 52 | 53 | |
| 66 | 3.0B USD | 52 | 69 | |
| 67 | 507.3B JPY (≈$3.4B) | 52 | 48 | |
| 68 | 1.9B USD | 52 | 79 | |
| 69 | 1.45T KRW (≈$1.0B) | 51 | 58 | |
| 70 | 2.7B EUR (≈$2.9B) | 50 | 58 | |
| 71 | 978M GBP (≈$1.3B) | 49 | 67 | |
| 72 | 2.5B USD | 48 | 32 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score