Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Ziff Davis, Inc.
How Ziff Davis, Inc. stacks up
ZD · against 121 other Communication Services companies of similar size
Growth
94/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #8 of 122 · scores higher than 93% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score12 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including ZD · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 94?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth and revenue growth, which are stronger than most Communication Services peers.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 1.6% vs peer median 3.0%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 65% of peers. Revenue growth: 7.8% vs peer median 3.0%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 99% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 1064.3% vs peer median 8.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ZD, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ZD | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 123 reported | 7.8% | 3.1% | 66% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 77 reported | 1064.3% | 7.7% | 97% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 119 reported | 1.6% | 3.6% | 38% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ZD| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15.2B HKD (≈$1.9B) | 99 | 64 | |
| 1 | 17.62T IDR (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 76 | |
| 1 | 1.0B USD | 99 | 71 | |
| 4 | 1.57T ARS (≈$1.6B) | 98 | 74 | |
| 5 | 1.0B USD | 97 | 87 | |
| 6 | 9.4B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 96 | 58 | |
| 7 | 3.2B USD | 95 | 57 | |
| 8 | 3.6B NZD (≈$2.1B) | 94 | 53 | |
| 8 | 1.9B USD | 94 | 79 | |
| 10 | 12.9B HKD (≈$1.6B) | 93 | 70 | |
| 10 | 2.68T KRW (≈$1.9B) | 93 | 66 | |
| 12 | 8.1B HKD (≈$1.0B) | 92 | 51 | |
| 13 | 1.7B EUR (≈$1.9B) | 89 | 50 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score