Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.
How Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. stacks up
ZBH · against 111 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Growth
48/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #76 of 112 · scores higher than 32% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score12 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including ZBH · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 48?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Its metrics sit close to the Healthcare norm.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 1.7% vs peer median 9.8%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 5.7% vs peer median 5.8%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 8.6% vs peer median 6.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ZBH, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ZBH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 113 reported | 8.6% | 9.2% | 47% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 88 reported | 1.7% | 17.7% | 31% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 110 reported | 5.7% | 9.4% | 40% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ZBH| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9.3B USD | 98 | 64 | |
| 2 | 14.87T KRW (≈$10.7B) | 97 | 76 | |
| 2 | 21.4B USD | 97 | 67 | |
| 4 | 16.5B USD | 96 | 37 | |
| 4 | 14.5B USD | 96 | 30 | |
| 71 | 133.4B BRL (≈$24.0B) | 50 | 49 | |
| 74 | 111.7B DKK (≈$16.8B) | 49 | 53 | |
| 74 | 21.7B EUR (≈$23.9B) | 49 | 47 | |
| 76 | 83.0B CNY (≈$11.6B) | 48 | 62 | |
| 76 | 18.5B USD | 48 | 54 | |
| 78 | 14.9B EUR (≈$16.4B) | 47 | 52 | |
| 79 | 22.3B SGD (≈$16.9B) | 46 | 57 | |
| 80 | 34.0B USD | 45 | 49 | |
| 81 | 99.2B CNY (≈$13.9B) | 43 | 67 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score