Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Yum China Holdings, Inc.
How Yum China Holdings, Inc. stacks up
YUMC · against 132 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Profitability
85/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #48 of 133 · scores higher than 61% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score22 peers with a profitability score of 80–89, including YUMC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 85?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its return on assets, return on invested capital and operating margin, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- a wider operating margin: stronger than 72% of peers. Operating margin: 11.1% vs peer median 6.4%
- a higher return on invested capital: stronger than 87% of peers. Return on invested capital: 22.4% vs peer median 7.3%
- a higher return on assets: stronger than 88% of peers. Return on assets: 9.0% vs peer median 3.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = YUMC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | YUMC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 127 reported | 22.4% | 13.7% | 65% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 135 reported | 11.1% | 10.7% | 52% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 127 reported | 9.0% | 6.1% | 72% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 123 reported | 16.8% | 17.5% | 48% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 135 reported | 20.3% | 33.6% | 20% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around YUMC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.48T JPY (≈$10.1B) | 100 | 96 | |
| 2 | 880.5B TWD (≈$27.3B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 2 | 184.4B HKD (≈$23.6B) | 99 | 91 | |
| 2 | 11.5B USD | 99 | 78 | |
| 2 | 10.7B USD | 99 | 50 | |
| 48 | 2.51T JPY (≈$17.1B) | 85 | 71 | |
| 48 | 73.9B BRL (≈$13.3B) | 85 | 58 | |
| 48 | 35.5B CAD (≈$25.9B) | 85 | 51 | |
| 48 | 15.2B USD | 85 | 36 | |
| 48 | 16.2B USD | 85 | 62 | |
| 54 | 28.4B EUR (≈$31.3B) | 84 | 59 | |
| 54 | 8.8B USD | 84 | 55 | |
| 56 | 18.3B USD | 83 | 55 | |
| 57 | 13.8B USD | 82 | 66 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score