Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Xylem Inc.
How Xylem Inc. stacks up
XYL · against 186 other Industrials companies of similar size
Valuation
54/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #64 of 187 · scores higher than 65% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score22 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including XYL · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 54?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 4.5% vs peer median 3.8%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 4.3% vs peer median 3.7%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 7.8% vs peer median 6.9%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = XYL, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | XYL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 179 reported | 4.4% | 3.6% | 63% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 187 reported | 8.1% | 6.3% | 68% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 87 reported | 4.3% | 3.4% | 69% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 176 reported | 49.0% | 24.2% | 74% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around XYL| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18.14T KRW (≈$13.1B) | 100 | 76 | |
| 2 | 21.8B EUR (≈$24.0B) | 98 | 66 | |
| 3 | 157.6B HKD (≈$20.2B) | 97 | 67 | |
| 3 | 91.3B HKD (≈$11.7B) | 97 | 73 | |
| 5 | 12.69T CLP (≈$14.0B) | 94 | 64 | |
| 62 | 495.6B TRY (≈$14.9B) | 55 | 52 | |
| 62 | 29.2B USD | 55 | 50 | |
| 64 | 15.4B USD | 54 | 54 | |
| 64 | 192.8B DKK (≈$28.9B) | 54 | 48 | |
| 64 | 22.5B USD | 54 | 59 | |
| 67 | 2.05T JPY (≈$13.9B) | 53 | 45 | |
| 67 | 12.9B EUR (≈$14.2B) | 53 | 51 | |
| 69 | 38.07T KRW (≈$27.4B) | 51 | 58 | |
| 69 | 21.1B USD | 51 | 50 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score