Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to XPO, Inc.
How XPO, Inc. stacks up
XPO · against 184 other Industrials companies of similar size
Growth
56/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #100 of 185 · scores higher than 46% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score27 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including XPO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 56?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 4.1% vs peer median 4.2%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 7.1% vs peer median 4.4%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 64% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 17.8% vs peer median 7.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = XPO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | XPO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 186 reported | 7.1% | 7.1% | 50% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 167 reported | 17.8% | 11.0% | 63% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 184 reported | 4.1% | 6.6% | 36% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around XPO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.22T INR (≈$14.6B) | 99 | 72 | |
| 1 | 12.1B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 3 | 85.2B CNY (≈$11.9B) | 98 | 75 | |
| 3 | 16.48T KRW (≈$11.9B) | 98 | 61 | |
| 5 | 18.35T KRW (≈$13.2B) | 97 | 56 | |
| 96 | 34.8B USD | 58 | 52 | |
| 97 | 2.06T JPY (≈$14.0B) | 57 | 62 | |
| 97 | 15.5B USD | 57 | 56 | |
| 97 | 28.3B USD | 57 | 64 | |
| 100 | 22.4B USD | 56 | 38 | |
| 101 | 35.1B EUR (≈$38.6B) | 55 | 50 | |
| 101 | 31.3B EUR (≈$34.4B) | 55 | 39 | |
| 103 | 11.2B USD | 54 | 55 | |
| 103 | 15.6B USD | 54 | 50 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score