Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
XELB · against 3 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #2 of 4 · scores higher than 0% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score3 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including XELB · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its earnings yield, EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
| Metric | XELB | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 4 reported | -805.3% | -589.3% | 0% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 4 reported | -22.7% | -11.7% | 33% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 4 reported | -259.2% | -167.8% | 33% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 4 reported | 681.6% | 90.8% | 100% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 21M MYR (≈$5M) | 87 | 68 | |
| 2 | 3M CAD (≈$2M) | 6 | 19 | |
| 2 | 1M USD | 6 | 3 | |
| 2 | 2M USD | 6 | 5 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score