Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Xcel Brands, Inc.
How Xcel Brands, Inc. stacks up
XELB · against 3 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Profitability
0/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #3 of 4 · scores higher than 0% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score2 peers with a profitability score of 0–9, including XELB · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 0?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its operating margin, return on assets and return on invested capital, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 99% of peers. Operating margin: -146.2% vs peer median 6.4%
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 98% of peers. Return on assets: -11.4% vs peer median 3.3%
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 95% of peers. Return on invested capital: -15.0% vs peer median 7.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = XELB, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | XELB | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 4 reported | -15.0% | -6.1% | 33% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 4 reported | -146.2% | -73.5% | 33% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 4 reported | -11.4% | -7.4% | 33% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 2 reported | -92.1% | -48.7% | 0% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 4 reported | 100.0% | 41.4% | 100% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around XELB| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 21M MYR (≈$5M) | 67 | 68 | |
| 2 | 3M CAD (≈$2M) | 65 | 19 | |
| 3 | 1M USD | 0 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2M USD | 0 | 5 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score