Ranked #211 of 219 · scores higher than 0% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score
19 peers with a profitability score of 0–9, including WULF · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 0?
Weighted metrics compared with all Banks & Insurance companies.
Mainly because of its return on equity and return on assets, which are weaker than most Banks & Insurance peers.
▼a lower return on shareholders' equity: weaker than 100% of peers. Return on equity: -1211.8% vs peer median 10.7%
▼a lower return on assets: weaker than 99% of peers. Return on assets: -24.2% vs peer median 1.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = WULF, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
WULF
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 199 reported
-44.7%
10.9%
2%
Context only
Operating marginHigher is better · 35 reported
-250.4%
13.3%
6%
Context only
Return on assetsHigher is better · 219 reported
-24.2%
1.3%
1%
50%
Return on equityHigher is better · 216 reported
-1211.8%
11.2%
0%
50%
Gross marginHigher is better · 228 reported
69.3%
0.0%
82%
Context only
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
