Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
WTTR · against 129 other Energy companies of similar size
Ranked #74 of 130 · scores higher than 43% of peers · safety percentile 46
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)9 peers with a safety percentile of 40–49, including WTTR · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger debt / equity, but weaker beta than most Energy peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | WTTR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 129 reported | 0.26× | 0.50× | 72% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 128 reported | 1.00 | 0.48 | 14% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 129 reported | 1.58× | 1.58× | 50% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.3B USD | 100 | 74 | |
| 2 | 1.3B GBP (≈$1.7B) | 99 | ||
| 3 | 4.4B USD | 98 | 65 | |
| 4 | 5.2B USD | 98 | 93 | |
| 5 | 14.8B ILS (≈$4.0B) | 97 | 63 | |
| 70 | 2.9B USD | 51 | 29 | |
| 71 | 36.8B CNY (≈$5.2B) | 50 | 31 | |
| 72 | 1.6B USD | 48 | 51 | |
| 73 | 17.6B NOK (≈$1.7B) | 48 | 75 | |
| 74 | 2.6B USD | 46 | 30 | |
| 75 | 1.9B USD | 45 | 51 | |
| 76 | 30.1B CNY (≈$4.2B) | 45 | 23 | |
| 77 | 5.9B ILS (≈$1.6B) | 44 | 44 | |
| 78 | 16.0B CNY (≈$2.2B) | 43 | 42 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score