Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
WTS · against 297 other Industrials companies of similar size
Ranked #59 of 298 · scores higher than 80% of peers · safety percentile 67
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)24 peers with a safety percentile of 60–69, including WTS · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio and debt / equity, but weaker beta than most Industrials peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | WTS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 293 reported | 0.10× | 0.57× | 86% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 287 reported | 1.13 | 0.87 | 28% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 290 reported | 2.66× | 1.57× | 84% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 22.4B USD | 99 | 62 | |
| 2 | 112.9B MXN (≈$6.1B) | 97 | 93 | |
| 3 | 1.36T JPY (≈$9.2B) | 96 | 70 | |
| 4 | 47.5B CNY (≈$6.6B) | 96 | 65 | |
| 5 | 1.06T JPY (≈$7.2B) | 94 | 76 | |
| 55 | 138.9B CNY (≈$19.5B) | 68 | 66 | |
| 56 | 17.5B USD | 68 | 60 | |
| 57 | 5.5B CHF (≈$6.3B) | 67 | 61 | |
| 58 | 307.2B TWD (≈$9.5B) | 67 | 73 | |
| 59 | 12.0B USD | 67 | 69 | |
| 60 | 85.2B CNY (≈$11.9B) | 66 | 75 | |
| 61 | 126.9B HKD (≈$16.2B) | 66 | 68 | |
| 62 | 8.9B CAD (≈$6.5B) | 66 | 66 | |
| 63 | 1.19T JPY (≈$8.1B) | 65 | 43 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score