Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
WTI · against 90 other Energy companies of similar size
Ranked #75 of 91 · scores higher than 18% of peers · safety percentile 10
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)7 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including WTI · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity and current ratio, which are weaker than most Energy peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | WTI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 87 reported | Not reported | 0.48× | — | — | 33% |
| BetaLower is better · 89 reported | 0.28 | 0.47 | 64% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 92 reported | 1.17× | 1.46× | 40% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.6B MYR (≈$341M) | 100 | 71 | |
| 2 | 1.0B USD | 99 | 72 | |
| 3 | 677M AUD (≈$447M) | 96 | 37 | |
| 4 | 526M USD | 95 | 36 | |
| 5 | 575M AUD (≈$380M) | 95 | 47 | |
| 71 | 4.7B CNY (≈$664M) | 16 | 31 | |
| 72 | 5.1B CNY (≈$715M) | 15 | 11 | |
| 73 | 4.2B NOK (≈$400M) | 13 | 18 | |
| 74 | 412M USD | 11 | 42 | |
| 75 | 534M USD | 10 | 38 | |
| 76 | 4.5B HKD (≈$576M) | 10 | 19 | |
| 77 | 306M USD | 9 | 48 | |
| 78 | 7.5B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 8 | 38 | |
| 79 | 809M USD | 8 | 39 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score