Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
How Williams-Sonoma, Inc. stacks up
WSM · against 355 other Consumer Cyclical companies listed in US-listed
Growth
39/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #249 of 356 · scores higher than 29% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score32 peers with a growth score of 30–39, including WSM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 39?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its 3-year revenue growth, which is weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 72% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -1.1% vs peer median 4.3%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 2.2% vs peer median 3.7%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 8.2% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = WSM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | WSM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 358 reported | 2.2% | 5.9% | 32% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 249 reported | 8.2% | 6.2% | 52% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 353 reported | -1.1% | 4.1% | 27% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around WSM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 79.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 1 | 3.1B USD | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 47.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 4 | 17.7B USD | 99 | 54 | |
| 4 | 293M USD | 99 | 89 | |
| 245 | 4.4B USD | 40 | 53 | |
| 249 | 454M USD | 39 | 45 | |
| 249 | 9.5B USD | 39 | 66 | |
| 249 | 1.57T USD | 39 | 30 | |
| 249 | 29.9B USD | 39 | 49 | |
| 253 | 680M USD | 38 | 55 | |
| 253 | 544M USD | 38 | 50 | |
| 253 | 571M USD | 38 | 30 | |
| 253 | 2.3B USD | 38 | 16 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score