Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to WeShop Holdings Limited
How WeShop Holdings Limited stacks up
WSHP · against 25 other Communication Services companies of similar size
Growth
60/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #5 of 26 · scores higher than 84% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score1 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including WSHP · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 60?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth, which is stronger than most Communication Services peers.
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 99% of peers. Revenue growth: -67.3% vs peer median 3.0%
- Earnings per share growth is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 97% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 40.2% vs peer median 3.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = WSHP, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | WSHP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 26 reported | -67.3% | -7.4% | 4% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 7 reported | Not reported | 23.2% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 26 reported | 40.2% | -5.2% | 100% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around WSHP| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 57M SGD (≈$43M) | 95 | 59 | |
| 2 | 7.7B JPY (≈$52M) | 94 | 70 | |
| 3 | 6.4B JPY (≈$43M) | 93 | 73 | |
| 4 | 32.3B KRW (≈$23M) | 83 | 49 | |
| 5 | 31M USD | 60 | 30 | |
| 6 | 59.4B KRW (≈$43M) | 46 | 66 | |
| 7 | 52M AUD (≈$34M) | 39 | 25 | |
| 8 | 47.8B KRW (≈$34M) | 38 | 60 | |
| 9 | 866.7B IDR (≈$54M) | 31 | 65 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score