Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Worthington Steel, Inc.
How Worthington Steel, Inc. stacks up
WS · against 385 other Basic Materials companies of similar size
Growth
77/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #82 of 386 · scores higher than 78% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score50 peers with a growth score of 70–79, including WS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 77?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Mainly thanks to its revenue growth, which is stronger than most Basic Materials peers.
- Earnings per share turned from a profit to a loss. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 9.4%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: -1.5% vs peer median -0.0%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 96% of peers. Revenue growth: 69.1% vs peer median 3.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = WS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | WS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 389 reported | 69.1% | 3.5% | 97% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 267 reported | -92.2% | 9.8% | 2% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 381 reported | -1.5% | 0.0% | 44% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around WS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.29T ARS (≈$2.3B) | 100 | 85 | |
| 2 | 11.8B HKD (≈$1.5B) | 99 | 77 | |
| 2 | 4.2B CAD (≈$3.0B) | 99 | 74 | |
| 4 | 3.3B USD | 98 | 66 | |
| 4 | 1.1B USD | 98 | 65 | |
| 82 | 16.4B CNY (≈$2.3B) | 77 | 64 | |
| 82 | 3.9B SAR (≈$1.1B) | 77 | 73 | |
| 82 | 9.4B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 77 | 59 | |
| 82 | 13.0B CNY (≈$1.8B) | 77 | 51 | |
| 82 | 2.0B USD | 77 | 29 | |
| 88 | 17.4B CNY (≈$2.4B) | 76 | 55 | |
| 88 | 17.4B CNY (≈$2.4B) | 76 | 42 | |
| 88 | 15.2B HKD (≈$1.9B) | 76 | 66 | |
| 88 | 2.5B USD | 76 | 35 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score