Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Worthington Steel, Inc.
How Worthington Steel, Inc. stacks up
WS · against 221 other Basic Materials companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
22/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #165 of 222 · scores higher than 25% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score18 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including WS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 22?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield, which is weaker than most Basic Materials peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -2.9% vs peer median 3.6%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 2.4% vs peer median 8.5%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 2.3% vs peer median 2.6%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = WS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | WS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 211 reported | 0.4% | 3.0% | 37% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 216 reported | 9.1% | 8.9% | 52% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 196 reported | 3.9% | 2.3% | 62% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 212 reported | 52.9% | 45.5% | 57% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around WS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.6B USD | 99 | 81 | |
| 1 | 768M USD | 99 | 80 | |
| 3 | 5.3B USD | 98 | 81 | |
| 4 | 7.9B USD | 96 | 62 | |
| 5 | 6.2B USD | 95 | 77 | |
| 161 | 916M USD | 26 | 29 | |
| 163 | 23.5B USD | 25 | 43 | |
| 164 | 4.2B USD | 23 | 25 | |
| 165 | 154M USD | 22 | 45 | |
| 165 | 2.0B USD | 22 | 29 | |
| 167 | 27M USD | 20 | ||
| 167 | 211M USD | 20 | 40 | |
| 167 | 287M USD | 20 | 21 | |
| 167 | 392M USD | 20 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score