Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Western Copper and Gold Corporation
How Western Copper and Gold Corporation stacks up
WRN · against 427 other Basic Materials companies of similar size
Valuation
8/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #350 of 428 · scores higher than 13% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score79 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including WRN · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 8?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, free cash flow yield and earnings yield, which are weaker than most Basic Materials peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. EBITDA yield: -2.0% vs peer median 8.5%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -0.8% vs peer median 2.6%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -0.7% vs peer median 3.6%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = WRN, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | WRN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 404 reported | 0.6% | 2.1% | 40% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 437 reported | -2.0% | 6.7% | 13% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 111 reported | -4.4% | -1.4% | 35% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 404 reported | Not reported | 74.4% | — | — | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around WRN| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 577.1B KRW (≈$416M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 1 | 224.2B CLP (≈$247M) | 100 | 47 | |
| 1 | 143M GBP (≈$186M) | 100 | 95 | |
| 4 | 1.9B MYR (≈$416M) | 99 | 81 | |
| 4 | 629.2B CLP (≈$692M) | 99 | 41 | |
| 350 | 338M USD | 8 | ||
| 350 | 284M CAD (≈$208M) | 8 | ||
| 350 | 431M USD | 8 | 48 | |
| 350 | 352M USD | 8 | 36 | |
| 350 | 353M USD | 8 | ||
| 374 | 3.5B CNY (≈$494M) | 7 | 23 | |
| 374 | 4.6B CNY (≈$650M) | 7 | 16 | |
| 374 | 3.90T IDR (≈$242M) | 7 | 22 | |
| 377 | 1.9B CNY (≈$267M) | 1 | 15 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score