Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
WRB · against 120 other Banks & Insurance companies of similar size
Ranked #12 of 121 · scores higher than 91% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score12 peers with a profitability score of 90–100, including WRB · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its return on assets and return on equity, which are stronger than most Banks & Insurance peers.
| Metric | WRB | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 94 reported | 22.4% | 11.2% | 78% | Context only | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 9 reported | Not reported | 19.9% | — | — | Context only |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 121 reported | 4.2% | 1.3% | 90% | 50% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 121 reported | 20.2% | 13.9% | 82% | 50% | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 125 reported | 43.8% | 0.0% | 86% | Context only |
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 79.2B BRL (≈$14.3B) | 98 | 61 | |
| 1 | 536.3B ZAR (≈$29.5B) | 98 | 54 | |
| 1 | 24.3B AUD (≈$16.0B) | 98 | 45 | |
| 4 | 11.6B GBP (≈$15.0B) | 97 | 51 | |
| 5 | 28.3B USD | 96 | 85 | |
| 6 | 27.2B USD | 94 | 62 | |
| 9 | 35.2B USD | 92 | 81 | |
| 9 | 14.4B USD | 92 | 87 | |
| 11 | 23.4B USD | 91 | 38 | |
| 12 | 27.9B USD | 90 | 53 | |
| 13 | 379.7B HKD (≈$48.6B) | 89 | 78 | |
| 13 | 594.55T IDR (≈$36.9B) | 89 | 58 | |
| 13 | 38.5B AUD (≈$25.4B) | 89 | 58 | |
| 16 | 541.0B TRY (≈$16.2B) | 88 | 78 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score