Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
WPRT · against 60 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #42 of 61 · scores higher than 32% of peers · safety percentile 25
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)5 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including WPRT · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta and current ratio, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | WPRT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 59 reported | 0.05× | 0.63× | 88% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 60 reported | 2.21 | 0.31 | 2% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 61 reported | 1.14× | 1.42× | 42% | 33% |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score