Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Westport Fuel Systems Inc.
How Westport Fuel Systems Inc. stacks up
WPRT · against 58 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Growth
0/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #57 of 59 · scores higher than 0% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score17 peers with a growth score of 0–9, including WPRT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 0?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its 3-year revenue growth and revenue growth, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 100% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -57.6% vs peer median 4.3%
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 99% of peers. Revenue growth: -42.7% vs peer median 3.7%
- Earnings per share growth is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = WPRT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | WPRT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 60 reported | -42.7% | 0.3% | 0% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 17 reported | Not reported | -14.3% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 58 reported | -57.6% | -3.1% | 2% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around WPRT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 241M MYR (≈$53M) | 100 | 86 | |
| 2 | 34M USD | 99 | 27 | |
| 3 | 129M MYR (≈$28M) | 97 | 55 | |
| 3 | 37M USD | 97 | 44 | |
| 5 | 337M HKD (≈$43M) | 96 | 32 | |
| 55 | 119M MYR (≈$26M) | 3 | 32 | |
| 55 | 32M USD | 3 | 30 | |
| 57 | 425M HKD (≈$54M) | 0 | 4 | |
| 57 | 4.7B JPY (≈$32M) | 0 | 22 | |
| 57 | 36M USD | 0 | 8 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score