Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
WPP · against 93 other Communication Services companies of similar size
Ranked #82 of 94 · scores higher than 13% of peers · safety percentile 14
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)11 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including WPP · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity, current ratio and beta, which are weaker than most Communication Services peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | WPP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 88 reported | 2.58× | 0.53× | 11% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 91 reported | 0.73 | 0.59 | 37% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 92 reported | 0.87× | 1.23× | 30% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.08T JPY (≈$7.4B) | 100 | 67 | |
| 2 | 1.62T JPY (≈$11.0B) | 99 | 79 | |
| 3 | 615.0B JPY (≈$4.2B) | 99 | 67 | |
| 4 | 93.9B MXN (≈$5.1B) | 97 | 82 | |
| 5 | 35.4B CNY (≈$5.0B) | 95 | 65 | |
| 78 | 3.6B USD | 18 | 22 | |
| 79 | 11.0B USD | 17 | 36 | |
| 80 | 15.5B CAD (≈$11.3B) | 15 | 53 | |
| 81 | 3.8B USD | 15 | 54 | |
| 82 | 5.9B USD | 14 | 23 | |
| 83 | 18.7B ILS (≈$5.0B) | 14 | 51 | |
| 84 | 4.6B USD | 13 | 39 | |
| 85 | 5.4B USD | 11 | 59 | |
| 86 | 39.0B HKD (≈$5.0B) | 9 | 38 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score