Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to W. P. Carey Inc.
How W. P. Carey Inc. stacks up
WPC · against 68 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Growth
74/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #19 of 69 · scores higher than 74% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score8 peers with a growth score of 70–79, including WPC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 74?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth and revenue growth, which are stronger than most Real Estate peers.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 2.4% vs peer median 3.8%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 70% of peers. Revenue growth: 9.0% vs peer median 3.0%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 86% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 86.4% vs peer median 11.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = WPC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | WPC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 70 reported | 9.0% | 4.8% | 71% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 58 reported | 86.4% | 14.7% | 79% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 68 reported | 2.4% | 5.7% | 19% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around WPC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.1B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 2 | 7.60T CLP (≈$8.4B) | 99 | 86 | |
| 3 | 11.7B USD | 98 | 49 | |
| 3 | 13.7B USD | 98 | 70 | |
| 5 | 15.2B USD | 97 | 66 | |
| 15 | 1.06T INR (≈$12.7B) | 81 | 74 | |
| 16 | 732.8B INR (≈$8.8B) | 78 | 69 | |
| 17 | 8.6B USD | 76 | 56 | |
| 18 | 1.40T JPY (≈$9.6B) | 75 | 58 | |
| 19 | 14.7B USD | 74 | 61 | |
| 20 | 13.9B USD | 73 | 43 | |
| 20 | 10.8B USD | 73 | 53 | |
| 22 | 17.2B USD | 72 | 67 | |
| 23 | 12.7B USD | 71 | 47 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score