Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
WOOF · against 630 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #78 of 631 · scores higher than 86% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score64 peers with a valuation score of 80–89, including WOOF · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its free cash flow yield, which is stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
| Metric | WOOF | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 624 reported | 3.7% | 3.7% | 50% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 643 reported | 10.1% | 8.7% | 60% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 167 reported | 30.9% | 7.6% | 96% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 626 reported | 156.8% | 61.1% | 91% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 623.0B KRW (≈$449M) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 1.49T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 3 | 3.2B HKD (≈$408M) | 99 | 79 | |
| 3 | 10.4B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 99 | 88 | |
| 3 | 3.9B HKD (≈$498M) | 99 | 74 | |
| 78 | 126.8B JPY (≈$862M) | 86 | 75 | |
| 78 | 299M GBP (≈$388M) | 86 | 55 | |
| 78 | 1.1B USD | 86 | 52 | |
| 78 | 1.8B SGD (≈$1.4B) | 86 | 76 | |
| 78 | 770M USD | 86 | 48 | |
| 88 | 662.8B KRW (≈$477M) | 85 | 39 | |
| 88 | 3.0B HKD (≈$389M) | 85 | 56 | |
| 88 | 184.7B JPY (≈$1.3B) | 85 | 65 | |
| 88 | 96.5B JPY (≈$656M) | 85 | 66 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score