Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Workhorse Group, Inc.
How Workhorse Group, Inc. stacks up
WKHS · against 47 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
6/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #43 of 48 · scores higher than 6% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score7 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including WKHS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 6?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield, EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -249.8% vs peer median 4.4%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. EBITDA yield: -58.1% vs peer median 8.8%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -159.9% vs peer median 6.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = WKHS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | WKHS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 49 reported | -249.8% | -13.6% | 6% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 54 reported | -58.1% | 9.0% | 4% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 34 reported | -159.9% | 6.7% | 0% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 51 reported | 79.6% | 210.9% | 24% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around WKHS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 163M BRL (≈$29M) | 96 | 77 | |
| 2 | 237M MYR (≈$52M) | 94 | 88 | |
| 2 | 750M MXN (≈$40M) | 94 | 56 | |
| 4 | 170M MYR (≈$37M) | 92 | 74 | |
| 5 | 241M MYR (≈$53M) | 91 | 86 | |
| 39 | 131M BRL (≈$24M) | 14 | 40 | |
| 41 | 263M BRL (≈$47M) | 13 | 37 | |
| 42 | 198M HKD (≈$25M) | 9 | 34 | |
| 43 | 120M MYR (≈$26M) | 6 | 30 | |
| 43 | 34M USD | 6 | 27 | |
| 43 | 36M USD | 6 | 8 | |
| 46 | 337M HKD (≈$43M) | 0 | 32 | |
| 46 | 180M HKD (≈$23M) | 0 | 17 | |
| 46 | 4.7B JPY (≈$32M) | 0 | 22 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score