Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Workhorse Group, Inc.
How Workhorse Group, Inc. stacks up
WKHS · against 56 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Profitability
0/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #56 of 57 · scores higher than 0% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score13 peers with a profitability score of 0–9, including WKHS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 0?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its return on assets, operating margin and return on invested capital, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 100% of peers. Return on assets: -53.1% vs peer median 3.3%
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 99% of peers. Operating margin: -223.7% vs peer median 6.4%
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 99% of peers. Return on invested capital: -124.8% vs peer median 7.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = WKHS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | WKHS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 51 reported | -124.8% | 0.6% | 2% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 55 reported | -223.7% | 1.0% | 0% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 56 reported | -53.1% | 0.4% | 0% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 54 reported | Not reported | -4.3% | — | — | Context only |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 57 reported | -81.1% | 24.0% | 0% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around WKHS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 241M MYR (≈$53M) | 96 | 86 | |
| 2 | 237M MYR (≈$52M) | 86 | 88 | |
| 3 | 170M MYR (≈$37M) | 81 | 74 | |
| 4 | 271M MYR (≈$60M) | 80 | 63 | |
| 5 | 299M MYR (≈$66M) | 79 | 30 | |
| 52 | 18M EUR (≈$20M) | 6 | 31 | |
| 53 | 4.7B JPY (≈$32M) | 5 | 22 | |
| 54 | 425M HKD (≈$54M) | 4 | 4 | |
| 55 | 131M BRL (≈$24M) | 2 | 40 | |
| 56 | 34M USD | 0 | 27 | |
| 56 | 36M USD | 0 | 8 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score