Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to G. Willi-Food International Ltd
How G. Willi-Food International Ltd stacks up
WILC · against 271 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Profitability
71/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #55 of 272 · scores higher than 80% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score21 peers with a profitability score of 70–79, including WILC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 71?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Defensive companies.Mainly thanks to its return on assets and operating margin, which are stronger than most Consumer Defensive peers.
- Return on invested capital is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- a wider operating margin: stronger than 70% of peers. Operating margin: 12.2% vs peer median 7.6%
- a higher return on assets: stronger than 76% of peers. Return on assets: 6.8% vs peer median 4.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = WILC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | WILC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 253 reported | Not reported | 5.1% | — | — | 33% |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 271 reported | 12.2% | 5.2% | 78% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 262 reported | 6.8% | 2.9% | 84% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 261 reported | 12.2% | 5.6% | 78% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 273 reported | 30.0% | 28.1% | 58% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around WILC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 55.2B JPY (≈$376M) | 99 | 87 | |
| 1 | 14.8B THB (≈$413M) | 99 | 63 | |
| 3 | 6.5B TWD (≈$201M) | 98 | 69 | |
| 3 | 9.30T IDR (≈$577M) | 98 | 82 | |
| 5 | 3.6B CNY (≈$499M) | 97 | 67 | |
| 50 | 2.3B BRL (≈$413M) | 73 | 59 | |
| 53 | 65.5B JPY (≈$446M) | 72 | 58 | |
| 53 | 978M NZD (≈$587M) | 72 | 74 | |
| 55 | 39.0B JPY (≈$265M) | 71 | 70 | |
| 55 | 397M USD | 71 | 72 | |
| 57 | 644M USD | 70 | 54 | |
| 58 | 2.6B CNY (≈$371M) | 69 | 54 | |
| 58 | 336M USD | 69 | 63 | |
| 60 | 1.5B MYR (≈$326M) | 67 | 62 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score