Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to WhiteHawk Minerals Corp.
How WhiteHawk Minerals Corp. stacks up
WHK · against 196 other Energy companies listed in US-listed
Profitability
17/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #158 of 197 · scores higher than 19% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score18 peers with a profitability score of 10–19, including WHK · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 17?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly because of its return on assets and return on invested capital, which are weaker than most Energy peers.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 94% of peers. Return on assets: -6.9% vs peer median 4.4%
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 69% of peers. Return on invested capital: 5.5% vs peer median 9.3%
- a wider operating margin: stronger than 72% of peers. Operating margin: 23.7% vs peer median 11.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = WHK, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | WHK | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 190 reported | 5.5% | 9.2% | 31% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 193 reported | 23.7% | 13.4% | 68% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 194 reported | -6.9% | 4.4% | 11% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 190 reported | Not reported | 11.8% | — | — | Context only |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 197 reported | 100.0% | 41.2% | 98% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around WHK| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 22.9B USD | 100 | 72 | |
| 2 | 1.6B USD | 99 | 61 | |
| 2 | 1.3B USD | 99 | 59 | |
| 2 | 1.0B USD | 99 | 72 | |
| 5 | 3.2B USD | 98 | 66 | |
| 155 | 2.4B USD | 18 | 39 | |
| 155 | 1.3B USD | 18 | 53 | |
| 155 | 2.9B USD | 18 | 29 | |
| 158 | 1.2B USD | 17 | 32 | |
| 158 | 596M USD | 17 | 34 | |
| 158 | 17.6B USD | 17 | 31 | |
| 161 | 1.1B USD | 16 | 26 | |
| 161 | 651M USD | 16 | 39 | |
| 163 | 674M USD | 15 | 45 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score