Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
WH · against 265 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #238 of 266 · scores higher than 11% of peers · safety percentile 7
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)34 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including WH · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity and current ratio, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | WH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 256 reported | 5.57× | 0.58× | 5% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 260 reported | 0.64 | 0.84 | 66% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 256 reported | 0.99× | 1.49× | 17% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.7B EUR (≈$4.1B) | 98 | 82 | |
| 2 | 7.3B SGD (≈$5.5B) | 97 | 69 | |
| 3 | 480.8B JPY (≈$3.3B) | 96 | 75 | |
| 4 | 514.3B JPY (≈$3.5B) | 96 | 80 | |
| 5 | 9.5B CHF (≈$10.9B) | 96 | 37 | |
| 234 | 6.5B USD | 9 | 62 | |
| 235 | 3.1B GBP (≈$4.0B) | 8 | 40 | |
| 236 | 26.1B CNY (≈$3.6B) | 8 | 4 | |
| 237 | 25.0B HKD (≈$3.2B) | 8 | 60 | |
| 238 | 5.9B USD | 7 | 36 | |
| 239 | 7.9B USD | 7 | 26 | |
| 240 | 8.0B USD | 7 | 26 | |
| 241 | 4.4B USD | 7 | 49 | |
| 242 | 4.2B USD | 7 | 56 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score