Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to GeneDx Holdings Corp.
How GeneDx Holdings Corp. stacks up
WGS · against 364 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Growth
65/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #130 of 365 · scores higher than 63% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score47 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including WGS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 65?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth and revenue growth, which are stronger than most Healthcare peers.
- Earnings per share turned from a profit to a loss. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 9.8%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 83% of peers. Revenue growth: 25.4% vs peer median 6.1%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 84% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 24.3% vs peer median 5.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = WGS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | WGS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 367 reported | 25.4% | 6.9% | 83% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 204 reported | Not reported | 9.8% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 357 reported | 24.3% | 8.2% | 81% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around WGS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.1B EUR (≈$3.4B) | 100 | 100 | |
| 2 | 8.9B HKD (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 61 | |
| 2 | 1.4B USD | 99 | 73 | |
| 2 | 27.6B SEK (≈$2.8B) | 99 | 76 | |
| 2 | 2.1B USD | 99 | 96 | |
| 130 | 179.7B INR (≈$2.2B) | 65 | 74 | |
| 130 | 3.6B AUD (≈$2.4B) | 65 | 59 | |
| 130 | 1.1B EUR (≈$1.2B) | 65 | 44 | |
| 130 | 1.2B USD | 65 | 49 | |
| 130 | 2.0B USD | 65 | 29 | |
| 138 | 1.86T KRW (≈$1.3B) | 64 | 43 | |
| 138 | 12.9B HKD (≈$1.7B) | 64 | 83 | |
| 138 | 7.5B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 64 | 82 | |
| 138 | 2.7B CAD (≈$2.0B) | 64 | 54 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score