Ranked #95 of 169 · scores higher than 43% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score
14 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including WF · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 45?
Weighted metrics compared with all Banks & Insurance companies.
Its metrics sit close to the Banks & Insurance norm.
▲higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 86% of peers. Earnings yield: 7.3% vs peer median 7.9%
▲a lower price relative to book value (P/B): stronger than 87% of peers. Book yield: 84.2% vs peer median 79.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = WF, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
WF
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Earnings yieldHigher is better · 169 reported
13.8%
8.4%
86%
60%
EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 47 reported
Not reported
8.4%
—
—
Context only
Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 91 reported
37.2%
8.1%
91%
Context only
Book yieldHigher is better · 165 reported
164.6%
75.6%
95%
40%
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
