Ranked #155 of 162 · scores higher than 0% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score
12 peers with a growth score of 0–9, including WF · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 0?
Weighted metrics compared with all Banks & Insurance companies.
Mainly because of its earnings per share growth, which is weaker than most Banks & Insurance peers.
▼slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 96% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -48.8% vs peer median 16.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = WF, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
WF
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Revenue growthHigher is better · 169 reported
5.3%
7.3%
44%
Context only
Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 159 reported
-48.8%
12.4%
3%
100%
3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 164 reported
5.2%
9.7%
23%
Context only
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
